Digital Soldier
When the whole world is running towards a cliff, he who is running in the opposite direction appears to have lost his mind. - C.S. Lewis
I don’t know when it all happened for me, not exactly. It was probably eight or so years ago that I got serious. Looking back, I can’t believe it took me so long. All the signs were there. I guess I wasn’t ready.
Most of us have had one, a redpill moment. And my story is nothing special – I’m nobody, I don’t have access to privileged information or insider contacts. I just started digging and didn’t stop. Because, as a growing number are starting to realise, we live in some pretty strange times.
The few that dare lift their nose from the grindstone for a moment might ask a question: if we are “making progress”, why is life more difficult? We live longer, but have less time. We eat more food, but get less nutrition. We are more educated, but dumber. Those institutions that are supposed to serve us, such as governments, have swollen in size and yet, particularly in western nations, conditions degenerate. While the Internet and social media offer us an unprecedented ability to connect, most of us have fewer meaningful connections to others or to nature. Has humanity ever been so chronically ill, so medicated, so unhappy?
The madness has accelerated in recent years, even beyond the ability of the kayfabe of marketing, politics or “celebrity culture” to bewitch. Indeed, increasingly, any pretense to rationality is often dispensed with altogether. Insanity is tossed into our faces as though it were normal. Gaslighting, in other words. We are submerged in an ocean of propaganda, psychological warfare and influence ops. And many, not knowing what to make of it all, are drowning.
It’s been humbling – certainly a good thing in my case. Not just to learn that much of my picture of the world had been incorrect. But also to realise how late I was to the party. As I continue to discover, from the beginning there have been many voices trying to wake us up, researchers and others who had hit upon various facets of the lie during their work. And, in general, the closer they got to the core of it, the more these figures were marginalised and attacked.
Initially, awakening can be unpleasant, to learn you have been lied to by those in positions of power. And it can be a relief of sorts, as things begin to make more sense. Eventually though, it results in a massive recalibration of reality and also a reappraisal of how we interface with it. If we can’t trust what we have been fed, then we need to be more judicious about where we get our information and how we evaluate it.
In my experience, it doesn’t particularly matter which thread you begin to pull first. Eventually, it all unravels. 9/11. Epstein/Maxwell and human trafficking. International banking and the money system. Hollywood’s sinister underbelly. Secret societies. Supranational organisations. Big pharma. If you keep researching long enough, any rabbit hole will lead to the others. Many are deep. And some are dark beyond the average well-meaning human’s imagining. This is part of the problem. The enormity of the lie is such that, certainly pre-Internet, it was hard to coordinate the research. There was no combined effort, just individual fragments. Worse still, no one was listening. It didn’t affect Joe Sixpack’s life. He just wanted to be left alone. People weren’t ready.
It is more accurate to say that the intensifying storm of world events is lifting a veil upon an unfamiliar Bizarro world. For a concatenation of reasons, the glamour, the illusion is failing. And as we sober up from this nightmare hangover to confront life without the beer googles of the previous night, we might reasonably ask: who laced the drinks with Rohypnol? And why?
Snapping out of the haze presents us with problems. There is no shortage of people telling us what happened. Some of them have very loud voices. But how many of the holes in our memory, the gaps in our knowledge, should we permit authority, such as government, to fill in on our behalf? Or multi-national corporations and their sponsored “experts”? Neither has a history of credibility. After all, Pfizer paid the largest criminal fine in history (so far) for bribing doctors and falsifying data. And it’s hard to know where to begin with government lies, but false flags to initiate wars (Gulf of Tonkin false flag), WMD in Iraq), and experimentation on citizens without their knowledge or consent seem an appropriate place to start. For some reason, pointing out such past malfeasance is often waved away: “yes, but they wouldn’t do that now”.
For those that still want to believe the official narrative, the Covid-19 operation is one of the spikiest (sorry) redpill suppositories. I will just touch on some of the main features. Those looking for details and references might start with RFK jr’s excellent book.
Case fatality rates were overstated
Scientific modelling of the pandemic made it seem worse than it was
Early treatment was often explicitly denied
The role of supplements and other ways to boost health was not discussed
Unprecedented efforts were made to demonise repurposed medications such as hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin that were known to be effective
A deceptive “test”, PCR, was used that could be dialled up and down in sensitivity – in early stages of the pandemic, cycle thresholds 40+ were used, producing a result that scientists knew was meaningless
Testing asymptomatic people drove up numbers
Death classifications were deceptive – dying “with” Covid, not “from” covid
Hospital treatment protocols were poor – Remdesivir in the US, Midazolam in the UK and ventilators which resulted in unnecessarily high fatality rates
Lockdowns and masks were widespread despite being known to be counter-productive for a respiratory viral illness
Experimental treatments marketed as “vaccines”, that were known to be dangerous and ineffective, were pushed as the only way out of the pandemic
Social measures were designed to bribe, bully and coerce people into accepting the “new normal”
Measures were enforced on children who were at no risk from the disease
Any voices that ran counter to the official narrative were censored or silenced by other means, particularly if these voices carried weight
I could, unfortunately, go on. The full extent of the damage will no doubt take years to emerge1. I don’t want to gloss over the magnitude of these crimes against humanity. The point I wish to make here is that the lying was systematic. And critically, when every measure pushed increased suffering and death, we are dealing not with incompetence but malice.
Those that were awake before Covid watched it all unfold in slow-motion horror. But there were operations before this. This is no time to be smug - we were all under the spell at some point. Nevertheless, it came as a shock to many how hard it was to get others to look at evidence that ran contrary to “The Narrative”. It was often dismissed, sometimes with hostility.
I don’t think many realised the full danger of our predicament. Until we saw it with our own eyes. We saw family members turn against each other. We saw countries we thought were free build concentration, sorry, “quarantine” camps. And crush dissent with violence. Or by freezing demonstrators’ bank accounts. And we saw the corporate world, celebrities and other “influencers” acting in lockstep with governments by demonising those that went against The Narrative. Or those who just had questions.
Even those familiar with the experiments of Milgram and Asch, or mass formation in history, found the rapid descent into madness sickeningly surreal. None of it made any sense.
It was, of course, not about health at all. It was about compliance and training for the system being prepared – the Great Reset. And for many it was the first glimpse of evil in their lifetime, the hidden face of an enemy coming into view.
Now that the pandemic has been allowed to play out (although I suspect it was a far weakened version, a sting), many are more receptive to information that questions the narrative. For despite best efforts, the architects of this operation have not been able to hide all scientific data. Or indeed the evidence of one’s own eyes. People are now not only ready to listen, but emotionally invested and paying attention.
This is deception on a scale most would have believed impossible. Indeed, if I had not seen it unfold with my own eyes, I still wouldn’t believe it. Which goes to demonstrate the decades of planning, of steering, of infiltration that took place without our awareness.
Whether we wish to accept it or not, all the evidence leads in one direction. A so-called “elite” engineered this situation for their own benefit. In addition, this group is not troubled one jot by the death, trauma and other loss visited on the human population as a result. In fact it seems to be a feature of the scheme.
In other words, we are at war.
Once this is recognised, there are several things to consider. Who is the enemy? How does it operate and what is it trying to achieve? What is its current position? What weapons does it have at its disposal? And what is the nature of the conflict, the lay of the battlefield?
All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu
And enemy or no, the current situation is also a result of complacency on our part. We were too busy eking out an existence. We were too jaded by politics or lacked the energy to keep up with it. We were too distracted by baubles: Instagram, porn, sport or whatever. Most people, content with simple lives, were not concerned with the clandestine machinations of a few. This was used to our disadvantage.
Moreover, this is a war unlike any other in history, at least as far as we know.
Deception is hardly new to warfare: the Trojan horse or the Ghost Army are just two well-known examples. But technology has changed matters. This is now 5th generation warfare. Unrestricted Warfare, a book by two Chinese colonels in the PLA, builds upon themes of guerrilla warfare and subversion to paint a picture of a battlefield without boundaries. No weapons are out of bounds and there is no demarcation between civilian and soldier. Everyone is a participant, whether one realises it or not. Controlling perception is therefore critical. Why, with the right narrative, a population can unwittingly march to its own destruction, or to the assistance of its enemy. Potentially without the knowledge that a war even exists.
My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. - Hosea 4:6
And partly, this is because while we are able to point and giggle at the clumsy propaganda of North Korea, or Soviet Russia, or even of government efforts from the past, most are less sensitive to the seriousness of the efforts to shape the narrative around us today. Some of this machinery became more visible during the Covid operation – for example the UK’s infamous Nudge Unit and other heavy-handed attempts to demonise “vaccine hesitancy” or “anti-vaxxers”. Many were suddenly using these terms as though they had been in common usage prior. There are echoes of “carbon footprint” here, introduced by BP as a marketing exercise, but now in common usage. The collusion between government and big tech in silencing dissent is being revealed in the US by lawsuits and whistle blowers. For most, it is not yet common knowledge how large the shadowy hand of intelligence agencies loom in the effort to disinform.
Anyone with a loud voice might be used to such an effect. So-called “fact-checkers”, authority figures, Hollywood assets, social media “influencers”, useful idiots who believe the lies, it doesn’t matter. The enemy will use all means at its disposal to form a self-reinforcing army arrayed against us. And when that fails, there is censorship, often under the Orwellian rubric of shielding us from harm.
And we are swamped in information these days, much of it propaganda, much of it fluff. At Event 2012, the infamous wargaming of a coronavirus pandemic in September 2019, attended by important figures in world health and industry, they were primarily concerned with questions of citizen compliance and controlling the narrative by “flooding” it. It is no accident that it is difficult to separate signal from noise these days The static is intentional. In the wake of the collapse of the Covid narrative, which still has a long, sickening way to go, how can we take any information we are exposed to at face value? As advertising and marketing have both become more subtle over the decades, so has propaganda. A lot of psychological knowhow goes into effective messaging. We are wise to apply the same lenses we do with ads to other information that is pushed on us, even entertainment.
No one has the time or ability to vet everything. Nevertheless, we have grown too comfortable deputising out our thinking to media, pundits and celebrities. A trust that has been weaponised against us. But it’s not all hopeless - part of the awakening process is recognising that some of what we have learnt is false. Nevertheless, we have good tools at our disposal to sift through the mess. Critical thinking (for some reason not taught at school), an understanding of cognitive biases and logical fallacies, data analysis: we don’t have to be blind when we pin the tail on the truth donkey.
And, as much as possible, an open mind.
I am more careful now not to dismiss information out of hand before evaluating it. A lot of material that would have been in my crazy basket many years ago is now on the desk awaiting processing. Especially when some of the people who were laughed at historically got things right - at least some of the time.
Besides, it’s not starting from scratch on one’s own. We’re all in this together, figuring out the truth and forming new trusted relationships in the process. It’s refreshing. And even in an information war of deception and propaganda, the truth is out there for those that look. The Covid operation has also revealed more of the battlefield, helping to dissipate at least some of the fog of war. Many of the pieces on the board showed their colours. We know who called for mandatory vaccinations, who censored those who tried to speak up and, at least for now, enough documentary record remains. It is a good place to start.
Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. - Matthew 7:20
We must proceed carefully. This is particularly true when facing an enemy that uses psychological manipulation and manufactured chaos. We must not jump to conclusions of guilt due to nationality, ideology or left-handedness3. Those involved must be judged on provable actions and intents alone. And, despite the gravity of the crimes, we must not lose our temper or be persuaded to abandon such due process. Impatience can lead to mistakes and this enemy may try to provoke exactly such a response. In haste, we may trample the crime scene or unleash fury on the first person to come into view. This might allow other criminals to escape or for evidence to be lost. All humanity must understand not just what has happened, but what was planned.
Ultimately, this war, though multi-faceted, has one core principle at its heart. Should humanity be free or should a tiny group be allowed to enslave the rest? We are lucky to have been afforded a glimpse of the future that awaits if the enemy is unchecked. Their dystopian vision is easy enough to flesh out with a little research. It ain’t pretty. Centralised control of everything: money, energy, information. A social credit system. All devices hooked up to the grid, the Internet of Things. People too, the Internet of Bodies. All under the enemy’s control.
The stakes are high, but waking up is a one-way event. No one goes back to sleep. And every time it happens, we grow stronger and the enemy grows weaker.
See you on the battlefield, fren.
Bad Cattitude, Igor, Eugyppius, The Naked Emperor, The Ethical Skeptic all offer a good place to start - but let me know if you want more places to look
Event 201 was also attended by the former Deputy Director of the CIA, Avril Haines. Because the CIA cares about your health
Disclaimer: I am left-handed